Verheul is mentioned a few times, mainly in relation to Gugel. Text gives overview of theoretical framework of architecture in the nineteenth century. The distinction between Kunstform and Kernform is briefly explained. | This book covers in detail the discussion of architecture in the late 19th. The role of the Society for the Promotion of Architecture during this period is discussed in detail. Muysken's ideas as president of the Society are discussed. | Book chronologically sets forth thinking about architecture in the 19th century. Provides primarily a historical and theoretical framework for the development of Neo-Gothicism. Chapter four ("The Fifties") discusses (early) neo-Gothicism. Weber is not explicitly mentioned. | Discusses Vogel's book 'Grondbeginselen' (fn 202) performance on pp. 130-131 | Gosschalk, educated in Munich and Zurich (under Semper), recognized three directions in architecture: the classicist tradition, neogothic and a third direction of those, who 'appreciating the good in both stylistic directions, felt annattracted to the so-called picturesque'. He himself belonged to the latter group. | Tétar van Elven is mentioned in combination with his translation of Vignola and his Henriëttehofje in Amsterdam. | Description of the debate on architecture in the Netherlands between 1840 and 1900. Here the position of both architects Metzelaar in this debate is also well highlighted.