Hulshoff, Allard Remco - Collectie Data Knowledge Graph - the-other-interface - Nieuwe Instituut LOD

Hulshoff, Allard Remco

A.R. Hulshoff (1880-1958) Allard Remco Hulshoff was born in 1880. His father Silbrand Klaas Hulshoff was medical director of the Children's Hospital in Utrecht. After the HBS in Utrecht, Allard studied in Delft, where in 1906 he obtained the degree of Architectural Engineer. From 1907 to 1915 he ran an architectural firm in Amsterdam together with Abel Kok. Notable in their oeuvre is the doctor's house with patient accommodation on the Pieter de Hoochstraat. Furthermore, two detached doctor's houses were designed, possibly through contacts through his father. Striking features of the detached houses are the large roof overhang and symmetry. In 1914, Allard was commissioned to draw up plans for the Academic Hospital, the Wilhelmina Gasthuis, in Amsterdam. A year later he became head of the buildings department of Public Works of Amsterdam. Under his leadership, many good architects were brought in and the department was given more financial leeway. Influenced in part by van der Mey, Kramer, and de Klerk, a distinctive design style emerged that would later be referred to as the Amsterdam School. Hulshoff was an ardent advocate of sculpture in buildings; thus, in 1916, Hildo Krop was brought in as city sculptor. After about 1930, the style tightened and more and more flat roofs were used. Hulshoff himself was involved in the expansion of the City Hall, together with Lansdorp, and the Second Surgical Clinic of the Wilhelmina Hospital. After that, he probably had no time for designs himself, as evidenced by the long list of ancillary positions. Under Hulshoff's leadership, many buildings came to fruition: schools, medical clinic buildings, laboratories, telephone exchanges, municipal streetcars, as well as much street furniture such as kiosks, urinals and all kinds of buses. In the later period Hulshoff did design the Municipal Hospital in Arnhem, which was completed in 1930. Public Works Amsterdam The Public Works Department was created around 1850. There is no exact founding date, but there is talk of a transition from the factory office to Public Works. In the early years, the service was difficult to manage, in part because of a lack of funds. A.C. Pierson and J. van Maurik were director of Stadsfabryckambt and director of Stadswaterwerken during this period, respectively. W.A. Froger, the inspector of Public Works appointed in 1852, immediately made a report on the state of maintenance of the property, which was very poor. He indicated how this situation had arisen, and how the service could be reformed, but the city council was reluctant and preferred to leave things as they were. However, the abuses such as open sewers, mountains of dirt, broken sluice gates and flooded cellar houses, were getting worse. Only the fear of cholera epidemics prompted some action. As a result of the unworkable situation created by Froger's criticism, eventually Froger, Pierson and Van Maurik all had to leave. The new guard, consisting of Verhey, de Greef and van der Sterr, did not venture to make major changes for the first few years. The enormous maintenance backlog continued to grow and the development of Amsterdam was dangerously stagnant. Important decisions such as the possible construction of the North Sea Canal and a connecting railroad station (the later Central Station) were endlessly postponed. As a result, the Amsterdam port was losing more and more ground to other cities. Successor Van Niftrik had many plans (e.g., expansion plan 1867), but they did not come to fruition. At that time there were private initiatives for improvement, for example by Sarphati (garbage collection service). Only in 1876 came a first design of Public Works Amsterdam and this concerns only a billboard. Other street furniture of Public Works Amsterdam consisted of urinals, the rest was private initiative. The leadership of the department initially consisted of a triumvirate (director, city architect and city engineer), but this did not work. In 1873 there was one director, the first being Kalff, who made a second plan for city expansion in 1875. Of this plan, only the station island and the area around Oosterpark were executed exactly as it was. Many other sections were adopted with some modifications. In 1876, a city cleaning system finally arrived and two years later a ban on open sewer ditches. There was hardly any sewage at that time, although some problematic canals were filled in. Kalff also reorganized Public Works. Successor van Hasselt reorganized again and was more successful in realizing projects. The department was split differently than before into a predominantly technical department and the buildings and urban development department. The technical department dealt with utilitarian buildings, paving and water works such as bridges and quays and was headed by the city engineer. The construction of sewers was finally tackled on a large scale. The mortality rate in the poor neighborhoods dropped dramatically. Meanwhile, a process was underway in which initially private initiatives in gas and transportation were continued by the municipality. This provided the Public Works Department of Amsterdam with a lot of work: laying gas pipes, electricity grid, telephone, a streetcar track and all associated buildings. For a long time, however, it failed to get a grip on housing construction. The technical department also had trouble with the aesthetic side of bridges, for example. In 1900, for example, H.P. Berlage was approached to give advice on a new bridge to be made. Berlage was then also given a major role in the expansion plans (Plan Zuid), while he also began to act as a kind of aesthetic consultant in all sorts of areas. Under the leadership of W.A. Bos, the division into technical departments was continued from 1907. This resulted in an organization with 14 departments, each with its own director. For example, Springer was the director of the Buildings Department, but he was also the only architect within the department. Bos hired a number of architects from about 1910, with J.M. Van der Mey taking on the role of aesthetic consultant from 1911. Bos did his best to properly delineate the consultant's position in relation to the director of the department. The consultant was initially a temporary position and he was not involved in the execution. Other newly hired architects were P.L. Marnette, P. Kramer (assistant to Van der Mey) and M. De Klerk. Also, in addition to practical engineers, scientifically trained engineers entered the service. Meanwhile, Berlage continued to work on urban extensions, resulting in the Plan Zuid. The new advisor soon came under fire when the first building designed entirely by Van der Mey and Kramer, the IJ Pavilion, went substantially over budget. A more austere bridge house set the tone for diverse street furniture. The replacement of street furniture became the consultant's core task; from 1911 onward, much furniture was replaced and improved. This explains why school construction between 1911 and 1914 was still rather traditional in character; austere neo-styles determined the appearance here. After 1914, the influence of Van der Mey also became visible in this area. Street furniture In the nineteenth century, street furniture was mainly a matter of private initiative, for example kiosks. It was not until 1918 that Public Works Amsterdam became concerned with complaints about the lack of facilities for kiosk personnel and sought a standard kiosk design. Two types were chosen, designed by J. de Meyer and N. Lansdorp, which replaced the old kiosks. There were also small buildings that housed a combination of functions, such as public telephone, waiting room for streetcar and the like. At the same time, combination buildings with transformer houses were also built, mostly to the design of A.A. Kok. From 1900 the streetcar became a municipal affair, and so after that all facets (laying rails, guardhouses and depots) fell under Public Works. The other elements of public space (roads, cables and pipes located below them) generally provided little cooperation with the Buildings Department, but transformer houses, for example, were often designed by architects from the Buildings Department. Starting in 1906, large-scale sewer construction finally began. The construction of the North Sea Canal (1876-) and the Willem II locks had severely reduced the flow of the canals. Since all houses still discharged directly into the canal, this caused many odor problems. In conjunction with the construction of sewers, a number of water treatment plants were needed. No architect was usually named for these works, but the works are included here. This also applies to pumping stations, for example, Westerman designed one in collaboration with engineers from the Port and Water Works Department. The role of A.R. Hulshoff A.R. Hulshoff became the head of the Buildings Department in 1915. At this time - due to Bos' reorganization - there were a total of 14 departments: Buildings, Planting, Paving, Bridges, Site Preparation, Ground Company, Port and Water Works, Sewerage and Water Refreshment, Urban Development, Utility Building, Municipal Workshops, Tools, Administration and Secretariat. On various projects, other departments collaborated with the Buildings Department, such as pumping stations and swimming pools. Moreover, General Director Bos stated in 1916 that works by other departments, if they involved an issue of an aesthetic nature, should also be submitted to Hulshoff. Under Hulshoff's leadership, the Buildings Department was given more financial leeway. As a result of the poor economic conditions caused by World War I, many architects from the private sector were laid off, wanting to work temporarily - also for low pay - for the Public Works Department of Amsterdam. M. de Klerk, too, joined Public Works as a temporary architectural officer on September 1, 1915, but left the Service after only a few months. Architects were given on-call contracts of a sort, but in the uncertain time during the war many wanted this, for example N. Lansdorp and A.J. Westerman. Others found the civil service method oppressive and soon left, e.g. M. de Klerk (six months) and G.J. Rutgers (gone in 1919). Incidentally, architects were also allowed to maintain their own offices. As a result, both private and government works can be found in the works lists of these archtitects. Influenced in part by van der Mey, Kramer, and de Klerk, a distinctive design style emerged that is subsequently referred to as the Amsterdam School. The change in style began with street furniture and became evident in school designs beginning around 1914. Hulshoff emerged as an ardent advocate of sculpture in buildings, so Hildo Krop was brought in as city sculptor in 1916. Many building sculptures were used in schools as well as bridges. After about 1930, the style tightened and more and more flat roofs were used. The crisis also limited the building budget. Meanwhile, Hulshoff himself was active in the planning of the academic hospital, the Wilhelmina Hospital. With the completion of the Second Surgical Clinic, most of his 1926 plan had come to fruition. Urban Development The role of the city development department increased greatly during the 20th century. As early as the 19th century there were several plans, for example those of Van Niftrik from 1867 and Kalff from 1875. Subsequent expansion plans are only for part of the city, lacking coherence. Starting in 1896, land is issued on long leases, with the municipality preparing land for building and regulating water management. In 1901 followed the Housing Act, in 1905 the Building Ordinance and a major improvement in building and housing supervision. In 1921, the city expanded significantly with the annexation of several areas, including Amsterdam Noord. The combination of water management and site preparation, ensured that building sites were now constructed well above the water level (1 meter on average). By 1916, the Municipal Housing Service had already been established, headed by A. Keppler. However, the Public Works Department was also concerned with urban development. Housing construction in the districts of Public Works Amsterdam was always carried out by private architects, although this included many (former) employees of the service. A kind of competition developed between the two services, which was "won" by Public Works. This is partly because the Municipal Housing Service paid too little attention to water management and the connection between neighborhoods. A new attempt at overall planning for expansions was initiated by Bos in 1926 and became an official part of Public Works in 1928. In 1935 the AUP, the General Expansion Plan, was published by Cornelis van Eesteren. This would become the guideline for the expansions of the following decades. UvA The municipal university was the responsibility of Public Works from 1877 until its separation in about 1971. Consequently, the building locations and many designs came from this department. This led to a somewhat ambiguous policy in the case of the Binnengasthuis; here the interests of the university and of the municipal hospital often did not coincide. Eventually, the university hospital came to occupy the grounds of the Buitengasthuis. The development of the Binnengasthuis stagnated thereafter. In 1955, the three-core plan emerged, bringing together the alpha, beta and medical faculties each at its own location. The alphas thereby came to the Binnengasthuis grounds, where there was ample space after the departure of the Dutch Bank. The Municipality was able to direct these processes to a great extent, since it had promised the bank the area of the planned City Hall on Frederiksplein. The beta subjects were housed on the Roeterseiland where several laboratories were already located by then. The first new building differed greatly in scale from its surroundings, leading to many protests. The medical faculties were planned around the Wilhelmina Hospital. When the latter proved unfeasible, a site in the Bullewijk was chosen; this is where the current Academic Medical Center, the AMC, arose. At the same time, there were increasing proposals to move the university to the periphery of the city, just like the Free University on the Boelelaan. This was mainly because in the 1960s the number of students grew excessively and there was a constant housing problem. The position of Public Works Amsterdam is clear from a 1967 memo advocating the maintenance of the university in the center: "It would therefore be an impoverishment if the University were to retreat to a more isolated situation on the outskirts of society, for in spite of all good connection and other precautions the connection with urban life is lost to a considerable extent. An accompanying map from that year shows that the planned alpha cluster then extends all the way to Oude Hoogstraat, causing many protests. This area contained many residential monuments, which would surely have to give way to large lecture halls. In the meantime, the University moved into several office buildings that had come about outside the influence of Public Works. With the removal of municipal funding and the separation of university and municipal administration, the University of Amsterdam began an independent existence. Welfare The beauty commission had been active since about 1880 but was temporarily absent. There was a committee old and new town, but they did not review designs by the municipality. For new municipal plans for expansion districts, supervisors were appointed, for example Hulshoff or Gratama, who acted as coordinators and welstand committee for the entire district. Public Works Amsterdam also carried out a large number of restorations, especially in the inner city. This and other monument work was overseen by the Old Town Beauty Commission based on an initial monument ordinance from 1927. This required the municipality to give permission for conversion or demolition of listed properties. There was also the beginning of a zoning ordinance. When director Bos left in 1926, De Graaff of the Bridge Department succeeded him. There was increasing criticism from the city council about the high cost of the "decorated buildings. The design style sobered and tightened from about 1930 to an Amsterdam variant of the New Objectivity. However, a remnant of the Amsterdam School style can often still be recognized in the detailing. In 1946 both de Graaff and Hulshoff left the service and a new period began with Leupen as director of Buildings. The city development department became increasingly important, and sanitation and scaling up were spearheads of the policy. Amsterdam-Zuidoost was designed and the subway was constructed. With the establishment of the district councils in about 1985, Public Works Amsterdam was split up by district and this once mighty department lost its grip on the city. What remains is an incredible amount of buildings and street furniture. The BONAS inventory The Hulshoff oeuvre list includes all the work of this architect known to BONAS. BONAS also has a list of 'Public Works Amsterdam anonymous', with works that cannot (yet) be linked to specific architects. Sanne Alberts 19-09-2005 last update 19-12-2006 Education: HBS Utrecht/;Delft/-1906 Additional functions: MBVA/committee on the position of civil servant architect and private work/1918;Amstel's Bouwvereeniging/aesthetic committee, drawing up boundary conditions for built-up area between Amsteldijk, Amstelkanaal, Rijnstraat and Waverstraat/1921-1922;BNA/member committee on expansion of the second chamber/1921;BNA/board of BNA (ordinary member)/1922-1923;BNA/BNA representative Verbond van Nederlandse Kunstenaarsvereening/1922-1923;BNA/working group civil servant Architect/1922;BNA/placeholder member committee of Information /1923;Municipality of Amsterdam on behalf of BNA/plvv member beauty committee/1923-1924;exhibition 25 years of Dutch Architecture/member exhibition committee/1923;Municipality of Amsterdam/jury member Rokin competition/1924;Municipality of Amsterdam/jury of competition for monumental lantern on Dam/1924;BNA/vice chairman of the executive committee/1924;BNA/Committee of Editorial/1924;BNA/ordinary member of the committee of Information/1924;Municipality of Amsterdam/committee Plan west (6000 dwellings) area between Postjesweg, Rembrandtpark/Ortheliuskade, Erasmusgracht and Admiralengracht, assessment of plans on architectural quality and stbk coherence/early 20'-years;Municipality of Amsterdam/commission Hoofddorpplein, area between Sloterkade, verm Rijnsburgstraat, verm Westlandgracht, north boundary unknown/1923- 1925;Wagnervereniging/jurylid prize competition opera house/1925;prize competition monument van Heutz/jurylid/1925;Prix de Rome/jurylid/1927;BNA/member of the beauty commission Amsterdam as architect/1927;BNA/Commission of appeal Amsterdam/1927;BNA/Commission Zuid Amsterdam/1927;Municipality of Enschede/advice conditions council house Enschede/1928;Municipality of Enschede/committee member competition council house Enschede/1928-1929;Bijenkorf/jury building branch Rotterdam/1928;Municipality of Bloemendaal/advice location council house/1929;Bijenkorf/committee member competition new Bijenkorf Rotterdam/1929;Philips/jury competition Philips radio monument/1930;Municipality of The Hague/jury city hall and police station/1930;BNA/committee on competition/1932;municipality of Amsterdam/technical subcommittee on research council house in Palace/1932;Hervormde Gemeente Amsterdam/member committee for new building Diaconie orphanage Amsterdam/1932;municipality of Amsterdam/ordinary member jury competition Amsterdam city hall/1936-1937;exhibition Dutch New Churches/committee churches/1948;BNA/ deputy member of the Central Council of Order/1950;BNA/vice-chairman board of appeal for supervision of the Architects Stand/1954-1956;BNA/vice-chairman of the board of appeal/1955;Building Council Department of Education, Arts and Sciences/member/;Department of Waterways, committee on revision of general regulations/member/;Board of Arbitration for the construction industry in Noederland/member/;Architectural Commission of the New Town (beauty commission)/chairman/;exhibition Brussels on Reconstruction/submission of photos PW/1919;exhibition Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam on Housing design/part catalog/1921;exhibition building Municipal Tram Leidsebosje Amsterdam on 25 years of Architecture 1898-1923/organization/1923;exhibition Militia Hall Singel 423 on the Amsterdam Bosch Plan/organization/1937 Honors: Officer in the Order of Orange Nassau
Architecture in the Netherlands : third annual supplement of the Algemeen Handelsblad devoted to Contemporary architectureTo H.H. directors of the foundation "The Wagner Association"To H.H. directors of the foundation 'De Wagnervereeniging'.The aesthetic management of Amstel's Bouwvereeniging's housing development in the expansion Zuid in AmsterdamThe aesthetic management of Amstel's Bouwvereeniging's housing development in the expansion Zuid in AmsterdamThe aesthetic management of Amstel's Bouwvereeniging's housing development in the expansion Zuid in AmsterdamThe aesthetic management of Amstel's Bouwvereeniging's housing development in the expansion Zuid in AmsterdamThe buildings section of P.W. Amsterdam at the Paris Exhibition.The buildings section of P.W. Amsterdam at the Paris Exhibition.The Buildings Department of P.W. Amsterdam at the Paris ExhibitionThe master builder J.F. StaalThe aesthetic management of Amstel's Bouwvereeniging's housing development in the expansion Zuid in AmsterdamThe distinction of the department of buildings P.W. at the Paris exhibitionThe distinction of the department of buildings P.W. at the Paris exhibitionThe position and scope of work of the civil servant-architect and his point of view regarding the performance of private workThe Weteringschans, a suitable site for a new City Hall in Amsterdam?Diaconate orphanage of the Dutch Reformed Church in AmsterdamA new city hall for AmsterdamGroup of three residential houses on the Van Miereveldstraat in AmsterdamAmsterdam University Hospital and its surgical clinicsAmsterdam University Hospital and its surgical clinicsThe town hall in SpaarndamThe Geological Institute of the University of the City of AmsterdamThe main building of the municipal telephone service in Amsterdam.The main building of the municipal telephone service in AmsterdamThe new town hall in HilversumJury report on the competition launched by the city council of Amsterdam to obtain monumental lanterns on Dam Square.Opera House in AmsterdamOpinion of Mr FeenstraCompetition for the acquisition of monumental lanterns on Dam Square, Amsterdam, issued by the city council of AmsterdamCompetition for four monumental lanterns on De Dam in AmsterdamPromotion of structural engineersPromotion of structural engineersCouncil house construction in EnschedeReport of the advisory committee on city hall construction in The HagueReport of the advisory committee on 4 submitted projects of a building for 'De Bijenkorf' in RotterdamReport of the committee of review of the submitted sketch plans for a town hall in EnschedeReport of the committee of review of the submitted sketch plans for a town hall in EnschedeReport of the committee of evaluation of the submitted sketch plans for a town hall in EnschedeReport of the committee of the review of the submitted sketch plans for a town hall in Enschede
aut
100 years of Public Works : 1850-1950D'Ailly's historical guide to AmsterdamStreet furniture Amsterdam School 1911-1940School construction in Amsterdam. Educational organization and school construction in Rotterdam. Construction of schools in The Hague."Oostduin" at The Hague's Gravenhage's town hall plans12th International Congress of ArchitectsAmsterdam exhibition of home furnishings at the Stedelijk MuseumArchitect J. Boterenbrood +Architecture and the councilMessagesMessagesBoard of the B.N.A.Block of stores with upstairs apartments in VelsenBook review: Modern Architecture in the NetherlandsUnion of Dutch ArchitectsUnion of Dutch ArchitectsUnion of Dutch ArchitectsArchitecture exhibition 1893-1923 at Amsterdam (II)Architecture exhibitionArchitecture exhibitionThe Amsterdam Council House CompetitionThe Door. IIThe municipal girls H.B.S. at Euterpestraat, in AmsterdamThe new beauty commission in Amsterdam [...]The new wing of the City Hall in AmsterdamThe designs for a new main building of the Nederlandsche Bank N.V. on the Oude Turfmarkt in AmsterdamThe plans for the new Leiden City HallThe competition for the construction of the new town hall in AmsterdamThe competition for Amsterdam's town hallThe town hall competition for AmsterdamThe Exhibition "Dutch New Churches"The exhibition of the Guild BrothersThe transformer houses of the Municipal Electricity Works in AmsterdamThe rebuilding of the town hall in Amsterdam 1923A new city hall for AmsterdamA utopia?Society of Architectura et AmicitiaFacade sketches by N. LansdorpGroup of three residential houses on the Van Miereveldstraat in Amsterdam
keywords

Hulshoff, Allard Remco

A.R. Hulshoff (1880-1958) Allard Remco Hulshoff was born in 1880. His father Silbrand Klaas Hulshoff was medical director of the Children's Hospital in Utrecht. After the HBS in Utrecht, Allard studied in Delft, where in 1906 he obtained the degree of Architectural Engineer. From 1907 to 1915 he ran an architectural firm in Amsterdam together with Abel Kok. Notable in their oeuvre is the doctor's house with patient accommodation on the Pieter de Hoochstraat. Furthermore, two detached doctor's houses were designed, possibly through contacts through his father. Striking features of the detached houses are the large roof overhang and symmetry. In 1914, Allard was commissioned to draw up plans for the Academic Hospital, the Wilhelmina Gasthuis, in Amsterdam. A year later he became head of the buildings department of Public Works of Amsterdam. Under his leadership, many good architects were brought in and the department was given more financial leeway. Influenced in part by van der Mey, Kramer, and de Klerk, a distinctive design style emerged that would later be referred to as the Amsterdam School. Hulshoff was an ardent advocate of sculpture in buildings; thus, in 1916, Hildo Krop was brought in as city sculptor. After about 1930, the style tightened and more and more flat roofs were used. Hulshoff himself was involved in the expansion of the City Hall, together with Lansdorp, and the Second Surgical Clinic of the Wilhelmina Hospital. After that, he probably had no time for designs himself, as evidenced by the long list of ancillary positions. Under Hulshoff's leadership, many buildings came to fruition: schools, medical clinic buildings, laboratories, telephone exchanges, municipal streetcars, as well as much street furniture such as kiosks, urinals and all kinds of buses. In the later period Hulshoff did design the Municipal Hospital in Arnhem, which was completed in 1930. Public Works Amsterdam The Public Works Department was created around 1850. There is no exact founding date, but there is talk of a transition from the factory office to Public Works. In the early years, the service was difficult to manage, in part because of a lack of funds. A.C. Pierson and J. van Maurik were director of Stadsfabryckambt and director of Stadswaterwerken during this period, respectively. W.A. Froger, the inspector of Public Works appointed in 1852, immediately made a report on the state of maintenance of the property, which was very poor. He indicated how this situation had arisen, and how the service could be reformed, but the city council was reluctant and preferred to leave things as they were. However, the abuses such as open sewers, mountains of dirt, broken sluice gates and flooded cellar houses, were getting worse. Only the fear of cholera epidemics prompted some action. As a result of the unworkable situation created by Froger's criticism, eventually Froger, Pierson and Van Maurik all had to leave. The new guard, consisting of Verhey, de Greef and van der Sterr, did not venture to make major changes for the first few years. The enormous maintenance backlog continued to grow and the development of Amsterdam was dangerously stagnant. Important decisions such as the possible construction of the North Sea Canal and a connecting railroad station (the later Central Station) were endlessly postponed. As a result, the Amsterdam port was losing more and more ground to other cities. Successor Van Niftrik had many plans (e.g., expansion plan 1867), but they did not come to fruition. At that time there were private initiatives for improvement, for example by Sarphati (garbage collection service). Only in 1876 came a first design of Public Works Amsterdam and this concerns only a billboard. Other street furniture of Public Works Amsterdam consisted of urinals, the rest was private initiative. The leadership of the department initially consisted of a triumvirate (director, city architect and city engineer), but this did not work. In 1873 there was one director, the first being Kalff, who made a second plan for city expansion in 1875. Of this plan, only the station island and the area around Oosterpark were executed exactly as it was. Many other sections were adopted with some modifications. In 1876, a city cleaning system finally arrived and two years later a ban on open sewer ditches. There was hardly any sewage at that time, although some problematic canals were filled in. Kalff also reorganized Public Works. Successor van Hasselt reorganized again and was more successful in realizing projects. The department was split differently than before into a predominantly technical department and the buildings and urban development department. The technical department dealt with utilitarian buildings, paving and water works such as bridges and quays and was headed by the city engineer. The construction of sewers was finally tackled on a large scale. The mortality rate in the poor neighborhoods dropped dramatically. Meanwhile, a process was underway in which initially private initiatives in gas and transportation were continued by the municipality. This provided the Public Works Department of Amsterdam with a lot of work: laying gas pipes, electricity grid, telephone, a streetcar track and all associated buildings. For a long time, however, it failed to get a grip on housing construction. The technical department also had trouble with the aesthetic side of bridges, for example. In 1900, for example, H.P. Berlage was approached to give advice on a new bridge to be made. Berlage was then also given a major role in the expansion plans (Plan Zuid), while he also began to act as a kind of aesthetic consultant in all sorts of areas. Under the leadership of W.A. Bos, the division into technical departments was continued from 1907. This resulted in an organization with 14 departments, each with its own director. For example, Springer was the director of the Buildings Department, but he was also the only architect within the department. Bos hired a number of architects from about 1910, with J.M. Van der Mey taking on the role of aesthetic consultant from 1911. Bos did his best to properly delineate the consultant's position in relation to the director of the department. The consultant was initially a temporary position and he was not involved in the execution. Other newly hired architects were P.L. Marnette, P. Kramer (assistant to Van der Mey) and M. De Klerk. Also, in addition to practical engineers, scientifically trained engineers entered the service. Meanwhile, Berlage continued to work on urban extensions, resulting in the Plan Zuid. The new advisor soon came under fire when the first building designed entirely by Van der Mey and Kramer, the IJ Pavilion, went substantially over budget. A more austere bridge house set the tone for diverse street furniture. The replacement of street furniture became the consultant's core task; from 1911 onward, much furniture was replaced and improved. This explains why school construction between 1911 and 1914 was still rather traditional in character; austere neo-styles determined the appearance here. After 1914, the influence of Van der Mey also became visible in this area. Street furniture In the nineteenth century, street furniture was mainly a matter of private initiative, for example kiosks. It was not until 1918 that Public Works Amsterdam became concerned with complaints about the lack of facilities for kiosk personnel and sought a standard kiosk design. Two types were chosen, designed by J. de Meyer and N. Lansdorp, which replaced the old kiosks. There were also small buildings that housed a combination of functions, such as public telephone, waiting room for streetcar and the like. At the same time, combination buildings with transformer houses were also built, mostly to the design of A.A. Kok. From 1900 the streetcar became a municipal affair, and so after that all facets (laying rails, guardhouses and depots) fell under Public Works. The other elements of public space (roads, cables and pipes located below them) generally provided little cooperation with the Buildings Department, but transformer houses, for example, were often designed by architects from the Buildings Department. Starting in 1906, large-scale sewer construction finally began. The construction of the North Sea Canal (1876-) and the Willem II locks had severely reduced the flow of the canals. Since all houses still discharged directly into the canal, this caused many odor problems. In conjunction with the construction of sewers, a number of water treatment plants were needed. No architect was usually named for these works, but the works are included here. This also applies to pumping stations, for example, Westerman designed one in collaboration with engineers from the Port and Water Works Department. The role of A.R. Hulshoff A.R. Hulshoff became the head of the Buildings Department in 1915. At this time - due to Bos' reorganization - there were a total of 14 departments: Buildings, Planting, Paving, Bridges, Site Preparation, Ground Company, Port and Water Works, Sewerage and Water Refreshment, Urban Development, Utility Building, Municipal Workshops, Tools, Administration and Secretariat. On various projects, other departments collaborated with the Buildings Department, such as pumping stations and swimming pools. Moreover, General Director Bos stated in 1916 that works by other departments, if they involved an issue of an aesthetic nature, should also be submitted to Hulshoff. Under Hulshoff's leadership, the Buildings Department was given more financial leeway. As a result of the poor economic conditions caused by World War I, many architects from the private sector were laid off, wanting to work temporarily - also for low pay - for the Public Works Department of Amsterdam. M. de Klerk, too, joined Public Works as a temporary architectural officer on September 1, 1915, but left the Service after only a few months. Architects were given on-call contracts of a sort, but in the uncertain time during the war many wanted this, for example N. Lansdorp and A.J. Westerman. Others found the civil service method oppressive and soon left, e.g. M. de Klerk (six months) and G.J. Rutgers (gone in 1919). Incidentally, architects were also allowed to maintain their own offices. As a result, both private and government works can be found in the works lists of these archtitects. Influenced in part by van der Mey, Kramer, and de Klerk, a distinctive design style emerged that is subsequently referred to as the Amsterdam School. The change in style began with street furniture and became evident in school designs beginning around 1914. Hulshoff emerged as an ardent advocate of sculpture in buildings, so Hildo Krop was brought in as city sculptor in 1916. Many building sculptures were used in schools as well as bridges. After about 1930, the style tightened and more and more flat roofs were used. The crisis also limited the building budget. Meanwhile, Hulshoff himself was active in the planning of the academic hospital, the Wilhelmina Hospital. With the completion of the Second Surgical Clinic, most of his 1926 plan had come to fruition. Urban Development The role of the city development department increased greatly during the 20th century. As early as the 19th century there were several plans, for example those of Van Niftrik from 1867 and Kalff from 1875. Subsequent expansion plans are only for part of the city, lacking coherence. Starting in 1896, land is issued on long leases, with the municipality preparing land for building and regulating water management. In 1901 followed the Housing Act, in 1905 the Building Ordinance and a major improvement in building and housing supervision. In 1921, the city expanded significantly with the annexation of several areas, including Amsterdam Noord. The combination of water management and site preparation, ensured that building sites were now constructed well above the water level (1 meter on average). By 1916, the Municipal Housing Service had already been established, headed by A. Keppler. However, the Public Works Department was also concerned with urban development. Housing construction in the districts of Public Works Amsterdam was always carried out by private architects, although this included many (former) employees of the service. A kind of competition developed between the two services, which was "won" by Public Works. This is partly because the Municipal Housing Service paid too little attention to water management and the connection between neighborhoods. A new attempt at overall planning for expansions was initiated by Bos in 1926 and became an official part of Public Works in 1928. In 1935 the AUP, the General Expansion Plan, was published by Cornelis van Eesteren. This would become the guideline for the expansions of the following decades. UvA The municipal university was the responsibility of Public Works from 1877 until its separation in about 1971. Consequently, the building locations and many designs came from this department. This led to a somewhat ambiguous policy in the case of the Binnengasthuis; here the interests of the university and of the municipal hospital often did not coincide. Eventually, the university hospital came to occupy the grounds of the Buitengasthuis. The development of the Binnengasthuis stagnated thereafter. In 1955, the three-core plan emerged, bringing together the alpha, beta and medical faculties each at its own location. The alphas thereby came to the Binnengasthuis grounds, where there was ample space after the departure of the Dutch Bank. The Municipality was able to direct these processes to a great extent, since it had promised the bank the area of the planned City Hall on Frederiksplein. The beta subjects were housed on the Roeterseiland where several laboratories were already located by then. The first new building differed greatly in scale from its surroundings, leading to many protests. The medical faculties were planned around the Wilhelmina Hospital. When the latter proved unfeasible, a site in the Bullewijk was chosen; this is where the current Academic Medical Center, the AMC, arose. At the same time, there were increasing proposals to move the university to the periphery of the city, just like the Free University on the Boelelaan. This was mainly because in the 1960s the number of students grew excessively and there was a constant housing problem. The position of Public Works Amsterdam is clear from a 1967 memo advocating the maintenance of the university in the center: "It would therefore be an impoverishment if the University were to retreat to a more isolated situation on the outskirts of society, for in spite of all good connection and other precautions the connection with urban life is lost to a considerable extent. An accompanying map from that year shows that the planned alpha cluster then extends all the way to Oude Hoogstraat, causing many protests. This area contained many residential monuments, which would surely have to give way to large lecture halls. In the meantime, the University moved into several office buildings that had come about outside the influence of Public Works. With the removal of municipal funding and the separation of university and municipal administration, the University of Amsterdam began an independent existence. Welfare The beauty commission had been active since about 1880 but was temporarily absent. There was a committee old and new town, but they did not review designs by the municipality. For new municipal plans for expansion districts, supervisors were appointed, for example Hulshoff or Gratama, who acted as coordinators and welstand committee for the entire district. Public Works Amsterdam also carried out a large number of restorations, especially in the inner city. This and other monument work was overseen by the Old Town Beauty Commission based on an initial monument ordinance from 1927. This required the municipality to give permission for conversion or demolition of listed properties. There was also the beginning of a zoning ordinance. When director Bos left in 1926, De Graaff of the Bridge Department succeeded him. There was increasing criticism from the city council about the high cost of the "decorated buildings. The design style sobered and tightened from about 1930 to an Amsterdam variant of the New Objectivity. However, a remnant of the Amsterdam School style can often still be recognized in the detailing. In 1946 both de Graaff and Hulshoff left the service and a new period began with Leupen as director of Buildings. The city development department became increasingly important, and sanitation and scaling up were spearheads of the policy. Amsterdam-Zuidoost was designed and the subway was constructed. With the establishment of the district councils in about 1985, Public Works Amsterdam was split up by district and this once mighty department lost its grip on the city. What remains is an incredible amount of buildings and street furniture. The BONAS inventory The Hulshoff oeuvre list includes all the work of this architect known to BONAS. BONAS also has a list of 'Public Works Amsterdam anonymous', with works that cannot (yet) be linked to specific architects. Sanne Alberts 19-09-2005 last update 19-12-2006 Education: HBS Utrecht/;Delft/-1906 Additional functions: MBVA/committee on the position of civil servant architect and private work/1918;Amstel's Bouwvereeniging/aesthetic committee, drawing up boundary conditions for built-up area between Amsteldijk, Amstelkanaal, Rijnstraat and Waverstraat/1921-1922;BNA/member committee on expansion of the second chamber/1921;BNA/board of BNA (ordinary member)/1922-1923;BNA/BNA representative Verbond van Nederlandse Kunstenaarsvereening/1922-1923;BNA/working group civil servant Architect/1922;BNA/placeholder member committee of Information /1923;Municipality of Amsterdam on behalf of BNA/plvv member beauty committee/1923-1924;exhibition 25 years of Dutch Architecture/member exhibition committee/1923;Municipality of Amsterdam/jury member Rokin competition/1924;Municipality of Amsterdam/jury of competition for monumental lantern on Dam/1924;BNA/vice chairman of the executive committee/1924;BNA/Committee of Editorial/1924;BNA/ordinary member of the committee of Information/1924;Municipality of Amsterdam/committee Plan west (6000 dwellings) area between Postjesweg, Rembrandtpark/Ortheliuskade, Erasmusgracht and Admiralengracht, assessment of plans on architectural quality and stbk coherence/early 20'-years;Municipality of Amsterdam/commission Hoofddorpplein, area between Sloterkade, verm Rijnsburgstraat, verm Westlandgracht, north boundary unknown/1923- 1925;Wagnervereniging/jurylid prize competition opera house/1925;prize competition monument van Heutz/jurylid/1925;Prix de Rome/jurylid/1927;BNA/member of the beauty commission Amsterdam as architect/1927;BNA/Commission of appeal Amsterdam/1927;BNA/Commission Zuid Amsterdam/1927;Municipality of Enschede/advice conditions council house Enschede/1928;Municipality of Enschede/committee member competition council house Enschede/1928-1929;Bijenkorf/jury building branch Rotterdam/1928;Municipality of Bloemendaal/advice location council house/1929;Bijenkorf/committee member competition new Bijenkorf Rotterdam/1929;Philips/jury competition Philips radio monument/1930;Municipality of The Hague/jury city hall and police station/1930;BNA/committee on competition/1932;municipality of Amsterdam/technical subcommittee on research council house in Palace/1932;Hervormde Gemeente Amsterdam/member committee for new building Diaconie orphanage Amsterdam/1932;municipality of Amsterdam/ordinary member jury competition Amsterdam city hall/1936-1937;exhibition Dutch New Churches/committee churches/1948;BNA/ deputy member of the Central Council of Order/1950;BNA/vice-chairman board of appeal for supervision of the Architects Stand/1954-1956;BNA/vice-chairman of the board of appeal/1955;Building Council Department of Education, Arts and Sciences/member/;Department of Waterways, committee on revision of general regulations/member/;Board of Arbitration for the construction industry in Noederland/member/;Architectural Commission of the New Town (beauty commission)/chairman/;exhibition Brussels on Reconstruction/submission of photos PW/1919;exhibition Stedelijk Museum Amsterdam on Housing design/part catalog/1921;exhibition building Municipal Tram Leidsebosje Amsterdam on 25 years of Architecture 1898-1923/organization/1923;exhibition Militia Hall Singel 423 on the Amsterdam Bosch Plan/organization/1937 Honors: Officer in the Order of Orange Nassau